
                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 1
Table 999
Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total

Total                        3
Medians                   2.00
Maximum                   5.00
Mode                         -

Mean score                 2.3
Standard deviation        2.52










































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 2
Table 1
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Yes                          2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

No                           1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%




































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 3
Table 2
Q3 Number of children in family
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

No children                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

1 child                      0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

2 children                   1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

3 children                   0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

More than 3 children         1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Mean score                 2.3     1.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.52    1.41     -

Mean excl 0               3.50    2.00  5.00
Standard deviation        2.12       -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 4
Table 3
Q3 Number of children in family
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All who have used MRDCL before

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        2     2     1     1     0

No children                  1     1     1     1     0
                            50%   50%  100%  100%    -%

1 child                      0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

2 children                   1     1     0     0     0
                            50%   50%    -%    -%    -%

3 children                   0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

More than 3 children         0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Mean score                 2.0   2.0   1.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        1.41  1.41     -     -     -
























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 5
Table 4
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   3.00    3.00  3.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  3.00
Mode                         -       -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0     3.0   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00    2.83     -
Standard error            1.15    2.00     -
Error variance            1.33    4.00     -















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 6
Table 5
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Yes                          2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

No                           1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%






































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 7
Table 6
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Ate at a restaurant          3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Went to see a film           2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

None/NS                      0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 8
Table 7
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   3.00    3.00  3.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  3.00
Mode                         -       -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0     3.0   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00    2.83     -

















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 9
Table 8
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 10
Table 9
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 11
Table 10
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.00  5.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.0   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15    1.41     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 12
Table 11
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.50  4.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.5   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53    2.12     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 13
Table 12
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.00  5.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31    2.83     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 14
Table 13
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    5.00  4.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  4.00

Mean score                 4.7     5.0   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .00     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 15
Table 14
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.50  5.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7     4.5   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 16
Table 15
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.0     4.0   4.0
Standard deviation        1.00    1.41     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 17
Table 16
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 18
Table 17
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.00  4.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.3     3.0   4.0
Standard deviation        2.08    2.83     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 19
Table 18
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 20
Table 19
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 21
Table 20
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.00  5.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.0   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15    1.41     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 22
Table 21
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.00  5.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31    2.83     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 23
Table 22
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.50  5.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7     4.5   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 24
Table 23
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 25
Table 24
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 26
Table 25
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 27
Table 27
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.50  4.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.5   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53    2.12     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 28
Table 29
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    5.00  4.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  4.00

Mean score                 4.7     5.0   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .00     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 29
Table 31
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 30
Table 33
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Yes                          2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

No                           1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%




































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 31
Table 34
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Ate at a restaurant          3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Went to see a film           2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%





























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 32
Table 35
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   3.00  3.00  2.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.0   3.0   2.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.00  2.00  1.41     -     -















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 33
Table 36
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 34
Table 37
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 35
Table 38
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.15  1.15  1.41     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 36
Table 39
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.00  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.53  1.53  1.41     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 37
Table 40
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.31  2.31  2.83     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 38
Table 41
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  5.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 39
Table 42
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 40
Table 43
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.50  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.00  1.00   .71     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 41
Table 44
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 42
Table 45
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  2.50  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.3   3.3   2.5   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.08  2.08  2.12     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 43
Table 46
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 44
Table 47
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -


















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 45
Table 48
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.15  1.15  1.41     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 46
Table 49
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.31  2.31  2.83     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 47
Table 50
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 48
Table 51
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 49
Table 52
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 50
Table 53
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 51
Table 55
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.00  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.53  1.53  1.41     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 52
Table 57
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  5.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 53
Table 59
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -





















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 54
Table 61
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Yes                          2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

No                           1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%






































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 55
Table 62
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Ate at a restaurant          3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to see a film           2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 56
Table 63
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   3.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                         -  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0   1.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00     -     -     -     -     -

















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 57
Table 64
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 58
Table 65
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 59
Table 66
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3   3.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 60
Table 67
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7   2.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 61
Table 68
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7   1.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 62
Table 69
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 63
Table 70
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   4.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 64
Table 71
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.0   3.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 65
Table 72
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 66
Table 73
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.3   1.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        2.08     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 67
Table 74
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 68
Table 75
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 69
Table 76
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3   3.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 70
Table 77
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7   1.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 71
Table 78
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   4.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 72
Table 79
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 73
Table 80
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 74
Table 81
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 75
Table 83
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7   2.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 76
Table 85
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 77
Table 87
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 78
Table 89
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Yes                          2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

No                           1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **





































                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 79
Table 90
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Ate at a restaurant          3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to see a film           2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






























                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 80
Table 91
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   3.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00
Mode                         -  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.0   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   3.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **
















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 81
Table 92
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 82
Table 93
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 83
Table 94
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 84
Table 95
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Mode                         -  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 85
Table 96
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 86
Table 97
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 87
Table 98
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 88
Table 99
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00
Mode                         -  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 89
Table 100
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 90
Table 101
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00
Mode                         -  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.3   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.08     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 91
Table 102
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 92
Table 103
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 93
Table 104
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 94
Table 105
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 95
Table 106
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 96
Table 107
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 97
Table 108
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 98
Table 109
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 99
Table 111
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Mode                         -  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 100
Table 113
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 101
Table 115
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                             Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 16 May 2018
