
                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 1
Table 999
Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total

Total                        3
Medians                   2.00
Maximum                   5.00
Mode                         -

Mean score                 2.3
Standard deviation        2.52










































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 2
Table 1
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Yes                          2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

No                           1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%




































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 3
Table 2
Q3 Number of children in family
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

No children                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

1 child                      0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

2 children                   1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

3 children                   0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

More than 3 children         1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Mean score                 2.3     1.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.52    1.41     -

Mean excl 0               3.50    2.00  5.00
Standard deviation        2.12       -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 4
Table 3
Q3 Number of children in family
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All who have used MRDCL before

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        2     2     1     1     0

No children                  1     1     1     1     0
                            50%   50%  100%  100%    -%

1 child                      0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

2 children                   1     1     0     0     0
                            50%   50%    -%    -%    -%

3 children                   0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

More than 3 children         0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Mean score                 2.0   2.0   1.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        1.41  1.41     -     -     -
























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 5
Table 4
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   3.00    3.00  3.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  3.00
Mode                         -       -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0     3.0   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00    2.83     -
Standard error            1.15    2.00     -
Error variance            1.33    4.00     -















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 6
Table 5
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Yes                          2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

No                           1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%






































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 7
Table 6
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Ate at a restaurant          3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Went to see a film           2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

None/NS                      0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 8
Table 7
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   3.00    3.00  3.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  3.00
Mode                         -       -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0     3.0   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00    2.83     -

















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                               Page 9
Table 8
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 10
Table 9
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 11
Table 10
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.00  5.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.0   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15    1.41     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 12
Table 11
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.50  4.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.5   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53    2.12     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 13
Table 12
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.00  5.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31    2.83     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 14
Table 13
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    5.00  4.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  4.00

Mean score                 4.7     5.0   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .00     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 15
Table 14
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.50  5.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7     4.5   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 16
Table 15
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.0     4.0   4.0
Standard deviation        1.00    1.41     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 17
Table 16
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 18
Table 17
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.00  4.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.3     3.0   4.0
Standard deviation        2.08    2.83     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 19
Table 18
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 20
Table 19
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Top 2 box                    3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 21
Table 20
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.00  5.00
Maximum                   3.00    3.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.0   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15    1.41     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 22
Table 21
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.00  5.00
Maximum                   1.00    1.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.0   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31    2.83     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 23
Table 22
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    4.50  5.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7     4.5   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 24
Table 23
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 25
Table 24
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00    5.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0     5.0   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     .00     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 26
Table 25
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    4.50  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    4.00  4.00
Mode                      4.00       -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3     4.5   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .71     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 27
Table 27
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   4.00    3.50  4.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  4.00
Mode                         -       -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7     3.5   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53    2.12     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 28
Table 29
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       2     0
                            67%    100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1       0     1
                            33%      -%  100%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    5.00  4.00
Maximum                   4.00    5.00  4.00
Mode                      5.00    5.00  4.00

Mean score                 4.7     5.0   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     .00     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 29
Table 31
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                2       1     1
                            67%     50%  100%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1       1     0
                            33%     50%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%
Medians                   5.00    3.50  5.00
Maximum                   2.00    2.00  5.00
Mode                      5.00       -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0     3.5   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73    2.12     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 30
Table 33
Q7 Rating of brands - Metrixlab
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Not stated                   3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%
Medians                      -       -     -
Maximum                      -       -     -
Mode                         -       -     -

Mean score                   -       -     -
Standard deviation           -       -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 31
Table 35
Q7 Rating of brands - Phil
by Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
Base: All respondents

                                  Ever used
                                    MRDCL
                                 -----------
                         Total     Yes    No

Total                        3       2     1

Very good (5)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Average (3)                  0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0       0     0
                             -%      -%    -%

Not stated                   3       2     1
                           100%    100%  100%
Medians                      -       -     -
Maximum                      -       -     -
Mode                         -       -     -

Mean score                   -       -     -
Standard deviation           -       -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 32
Table 37
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Yes                          2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

No                           1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%




































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 33
Table 38
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Ate at a restaurant          3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Went to see a film           2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%





























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 34
Table 39
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   3.00  3.00  2.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.0   3.0   2.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.00  2.00  1.41     -     -















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 35
Table 40
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 36
Table 41
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 37
Table 42
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.15  1.15  1.41     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 38
Table 43
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.00  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.53  1.53  1.41     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 39
Table 44
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.31  2.31  2.83     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 40
Table 45
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  5.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 41
Table 46
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 42
Table 47
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.50  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.00  1.00   .71     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 43
Table 48
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 44
Table 49
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  2.50  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.3   3.3   2.5   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.08  2.08  2.12     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 45
Table 50
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 46
Table 51
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 47
Table 52
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  3.00     -
Maximum                   3.00  3.00  3.00  3.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  3.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   3.0     -
Standard deviation        1.15  1.15  1.41     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 48
Table 53
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  1.00     -
Maximum                   1.00  1.00  1.00  1.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  1.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   1.0     -
Standard deviation        2.31  2.31  2.83     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 49
Table 54
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 50
Table 55
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 51
Table 56
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .00   .00   .00     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 52
Table 57
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     2     2     1     0
                            67%   67%  100%  100%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -
Mode                      4.00  4.00  4.00  4.00     -

Mean score                 4.3   4.3   4.0   4.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .00     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 53
Table 59
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                1     1     0     0     0
                            33%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00  3.00  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                         -     -     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 3.7   3.7   3.0   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.53  1.53  1.41     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 54
Table 61
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     1     0
                            67%   67%   50%  100%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     1     1     0     0
                            33%   33%   50%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.50  5.00     -
Maximum                   4.00  4.00  4.00  5.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -

Mean score                 4.7   4.7   4.5   5.0     -
Standard deviation         .58   .58   .71     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 55
Table 63
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                2     2     1     0     0
                            67%   67%   50%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     1     1     0
                            33%   33%   50%  100%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.50  2.00     -
Maximum                   2.00  2.00  2.00  2.00     -
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  2.00     -

Mean score                 4.0   4.0   3.5   2.0     -
Standard deviation        1.73  1.73  2.12     -     -





















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 56
Table 65
Q7 Rating of brands - Metrixlab
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 57
Table 67
Q7 Rating of brands - Phil
by Q2 Activities in the past month
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Ate  Went  Went None/
                                at a    to    to    NS
                               resta see a watch
                               urant  film a spo
                                           rting
                                           event

Total                        3     3     2     1     0

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     3     2     1     0
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -


















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 58
Table 69
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Yes                          2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

No                           1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%






































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 59
Table 70
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Ate at a restaurant          3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to see a film           2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 60
Table 71
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   3.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                         -  1.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 3.0   1.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        2.00     -     -     -     -     -

















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 61
Table 72
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 62
Table 73
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 63
Table 74
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3   3.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 64
Table 75
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7   2.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 65
Table 76
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7   1.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 66
Table 77
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 67
Table 78
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   4.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 68
Table 79
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  3.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.0   3.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 69
Table 80
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 70
Table 81
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  1.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.3   1.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        2.08     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 71
Table 82
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 72
Table 83
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 73
Table 84
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   3.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  3.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.3   3.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 74
Table 85
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   1.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  1.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 3.7   1.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 75
Table 86
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   4.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 76
Table 87
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 77
Table 88
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 78
Table 89
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  4.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   4.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 79
Table 91
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                         -  2.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 3.7   2.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 80
Table 93
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 81
Table 95
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   2.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  2.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.0   2.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 82
Table 97
Q7 Rating of brands - Metrixlab
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 83
Table 99
Q7 Rating of brands - Phil
by Q3 Number of children in family
Base: All respondents

                         Total    No     1 2 chi 3 chi  More
                                 chi child ldren ldren  than
                               ldren                   3 chi
                                                       ldren

Total                        3     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -     -




















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 84
Table 101
Q1 Have you used MRDCL before?
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Yes                          2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

No                           1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **





































                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 85
Table 102
Q2 Activities in the past month
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Ate at a restaurant          3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to see a film           2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Went to watch
a sporting event             1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

None/NS                      0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






























                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 86
Table 103
Q4 Rating of postal service
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Bottom 2 box                 1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   3.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00
Mode                         -  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  3.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.0   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   3.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **
















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 87
Table 104
Q5 Rating of brands - Amberside
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 88
Table 105
Q5 Rating of brands - Bucknall
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 89
Table 106
Q5 Rating of brands - Caledonian
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 90
Table 107
Q5 Rating of brands - Derwent
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Mode                         -  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 91
Table 108
Q5 Rating of brands - Eggsceptional
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 92
Table 109
Q5 Rating of brands - Forster
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 93
Table 110
Q5 Rating of brands - Georgio
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 94
Table 111
Q5 Rating of brands - Harrisons
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00
Mode                         -  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 95
Table 112
Q5 Rating of brands - Irkutsk
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 96
Table 113
Q5 Rating of brands - Juniper
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00
Mode                         -  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.3   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.08     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 97
Table 114
Q5 Rating of brands - King
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 98
Table 115
Q5 Rating of brands - Leonard
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Top 2 box                    3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                              Page 99
Table 116
Q6 Rating of brands - Arnfield
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Maximum                   3.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  3.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  3.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   3.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   3.0
Standard deviation        1.15     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 100
Table 117
Q6 Rating of brands - Baker
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Maximum                   1.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  1.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  1.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   1.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   1.0
Standard deviation        2.31     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 101
Table 118
Q6 Rating of brands - Chisholm
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 102
Table 119
Q6 Rating of brands - Davidson
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 103
Table 120
Q6 Rating of brands - Enderby
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .00     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 104
Table 121
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating A
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               2     0     1     0     0     1     0     1
                            67%    -%  100%    -%    -%  100%    -%  100%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00
Mode                      4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  4.00

Mean score                 4.3   5.0   4.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   4.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 105
Table 123
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating B
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                1     1     0     1     0     0     0     0
                            33%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   4.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00
Mode                         -  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 3.7   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.53     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 106
Table 125
Q7 Rating of brands - Rating C
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     1     1     0     0     0     1
                            67%  100%  100%  100%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Quite good (4)               1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                            33%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Maximum                   4.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  4.00     -  5.00

Mean score                 4.7   5.0   5.0   5.0     -   4.0     -   5.0
Standard deviation         .58     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 107
Table 127
Q7 Rating of brands - New entry
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                2     1     0     1     0     1     0     0
                            67%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               1     0     1     0     0     0     0     1
                            33%    -%  100%    -%    -%    -%    -%  100%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%
Medians                   5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Maximum                   2.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00
Mode                      5.00  5.00  2.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  2.00

Mean score                 4.0   5.0   2.0   5.0     -   5.0     -   2.0
Standard deviation        1.73     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 108
Table 129
Q7 Rating of brands - Metrixlab
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 109
Table 131
Q7 Rating of brands - Phil
by Q4 Rating of postal service
Base: All respondents

                         Total   Top    Bo  Very Quite    Av Quite  Very
                               2 box  ttom  good  good erage  poor  poor
                                     2 box   (5)   (4)   (3)   (2)   (1)

Total                        3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1

Very good (5)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite good (4)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Average (3)                  0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     0     0     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%    -%

Not stated                   3     1     1     1     0     1     0     1
                           100%  100%  100%  100%    -%  100%    -%  100%
Medians                      -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Maximum                      -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Mode                         -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

Mean score                   -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -
Standard deviation           -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -

90 percent as lower case or *, 95 percent as UPPER CASE or **



















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019

                                                                                     My project                                                                             Page 110
Table 133
Q5 Summary
Base: All respondents

                          Ambe   Buc Caled    De   Egg    Fo    Ge  Harr    Ir    Ju  King    Le    My OOOO  phil
                         rside knall onian rwent scept rster orgio isons kutsk niper       onard extra   ONE
                                                 ional                                             one

Total                        3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3     3

Top 2 box                    3     3     2     2     2     3     3     2     2     2     3     3     2     2     2     3
                           100%  100%   67%   67%   67%  100%  100%   67%   67%   67%  100%  100%   67%   67%   67%  100%

Very good (5)                3     1     2     1     2     2     2     1     2     1     3     1     2     1     2     2
                           100%   33%   67%   33%   67%   67%   67%   33%   67%   33%  100%   33%   67%   33%   67%   67%

Quite good (4)               0     2     0     1     0     1     1     1     0     1     0     2     0     1     0     1
                             -%   67%    -%   33%    -%   33%   33%   33%    -%   33%    -%   67%    -%   33%    -%   33%

Average (3)                  0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0
                             -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%

Quite poor (2)               0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0
                             -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%

Very poor (1)                0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0     0     0     0     1     0
                             -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%    -%    -%    -%   33%    -%
Medians                   5.00  4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00  5.00  5.00  4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00  4.00  5.00  5.00
Maximum                   5.00  4.00  3.00  2.00  1.00  4.00  4.00  3.00  2.00  1.00  5.00  4.00  3.00  2.00  1.00  4.00
Mode                      5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00  5.00  5.00     -  5.00     -  5.00  4.00  5.00     -  5.00  5.00

Mean score                 5.0   4.3   4.3   3.7   3.7   4.7   4.7   4.0   4.0   3.3   5.0   4.3   4.3   3.7   3.7   4.7
Standard deviation         .00   .58  1.15  1.53  2.31   .58   .58  1.00  1.73  2.08   .00   .58  1.15  1.53  2.31   .58






















                                                           Prepared by a really good MRDCL specwriter on 27 January 2019
